On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> FFFE and FEFF are used to manage byte-ordering, so they really shouldn't be
> part of a URI (URIs should exist in a context in which byte ordering is
> assured, would be my take).
Neither U+FFFE nor U+ is a valid character, but U+FEFF i
Hi,
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Over the past week, I've been using my scant bits of nighttime coding to
> cobble together a pseudocode version of what I think the URI module should
> look like. There's already one available as example code, but it doesn't
> actually implement either the URI or IRI spe
