Rod Adams wrote:
I would be dismayed if autothreading used threads to accomplish it's
goals. Simple iteration in a single interpreter should be more than
sufficient.
For sure. No point in doing 10_000 cycles to set up a scratch area
for a single boolean test that might take 10 cycles.
A software
> "RA" == Rod Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RA> I would be dismayed if autothreading used threads to accomplish it's
RA> goals. Simple iteration in a single interpreter should be more than
RA> sufficient.
how autothreading is implemented is distinct from the language
feature. a simp
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:55, Rod Adams wrote:
> I would be dismayed if autothreading used threads to accomplish it's
> goals. Simple iteration in a single interpreter should be more than
> sufficient.
Sorry, I misunderstood. Thanks for the clarification.
--
Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:00, Luke Palmer wrote:
Aaron Sherman writes:
Well, more to the point, autothreading of junctions will hit the wall of
Parrot duping the interpreter. That's probably not something you want to
suffer just to resolve a junction, is it?
Wh
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:46:53PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:00, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Aaron Sherman writes:
>
> > > Well, more to the point, autothreading of junctions will hit the wall of
> > > Parrot duping the interpreter. That's probably not something you want to
