On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Michael L Maraist wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:47 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
> > Perl5 just used a string as the generic c-struct handle as far as I know..
Well, generaly what I see is that when c-struct-like data (that is,
byteform
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Michael L Maraist wrote:
> On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:47 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
> > Quick comment: I've been thinking about constructing an 'OpaqueHandle'
> > PMC type. All the programmer is supposed to know about it is that it
> > points to Something (usually a C struct, bu
On Sunday 02 December 2001 02:47 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
> Quick comment: I've been thinking about constructing an 'OpaqueHandle'
> PMC type. All the programmer is supposed to know about it is that it
> points to Something (usually a C struct, but they don't have to know
> that). I'm not sure what
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:15:08PM -0500, Jeff G wrote:
> Are you quite sure? Implementing things like arrays of PMCs will be hard
> without operations like set_value(PMC* pmc, INTVAL index).
This is why I'm waiting for Dan to come up with the explanation of how
kesy are going to work.
> > I d
Jeff G:
# Simon Cozens wrote:
# > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:21:38AM -0500, Jeff G wrote:
# > > Currently vtable.h is dynamically constructed from what
# would appear
# > > to be a union of all possible operators on
# {int,num,string}. Now, this
# > > is certainly handy (especially after having
Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:21:38AM -0500, Jeff G wrote:
> > Currently vtable.h is dynamically constructed from what would appear
> > to be a union of all possible operators on {int,num,string}. Now, this
> > is certainly handy (especially after having to cast one type to
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:21:38AM -0500, Jeff G wrote:
> Currently vtable.h is dynamically constructed from what would appear
> to be a union of all possible operators on {int,num,string}. Now, this
> is certainly handy (especially after having to cast one type to another,
> and making heavy us
Jeff G:
# Now I'll be the first to admit that I'm probably not the most coherent
# in the world at (looks at the clock) 1:19 A.M. but I'm sitting here
# trying to get something like a PerlInt_Array ready for compilation and
# noticing some problems. It's also entirely possible that I'm
# looking a
