Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-14 Thread Piers Cawley
"Buddha Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mr. Nobody wrote: > >> If you and Damian think you'll get me to leave p6l this easily, >> forget it. >> I've seen far worse flames than that. > > While you were the person that Damian lost his sense of humor at, > Piers didn't identify you in this part o

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-14 Thread Buddha Buck
Mr. Nobody wrote: If you and Damian think you'll get me to leave p6l this easily, forget it. I've seen far worse flames than that. While you were the person that Damian lost his sense of humor at, Piers didn't identify you in this part of the summary. So I don't think Piers was trying to ge

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-14 Thread Mr. Nobody
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > L2R/R2L syntax > Argh! No! It's back and this time it means business. The dreaded > left->right versus right->left thing came back, and this time it was > Damian applying the electrodes to the corpse. Of course, it being > Damian > he was instantly f

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-14 Thread Jerome Quelin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez earned at least one giggle when he > suggested that we just needed "v~" "^~" and we had our > own flavour of Befunge. I promise: Lyon.pm does _not_ earn anything from Chris Pressey [0] in order to support Befunge! :-) Jerome [0] Chris Pressey is

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-08 Thread Piers Cawley
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan-04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> Damian Conway wrote: >> >> >Piers Cawley wrote: >> > >> >>Acknowledgements >> > >> >But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6 >> >summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-07 Thread Steve Fink
On Jan-04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Damian Conway wrote: > > >Piers Cawley wrote: > > > >>Acknowledgements > > > >But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6 > >summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses > >that are P6-language and P6-intern

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-05 Thread Piers Cawley
Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley wrote: > >>* Thanks to everyone who has given me feedback as a result of these >>summaries. It's really good to know that people finding these things >>useful. >> > Me too. I find I no longer read the list because I c

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-05 Thread Paul Kienzle
Piers Cawley wrote: * Thanks to everyone who has given me feedback as a result of these summaries. It's really good to know that people finding these things useful. Me too. I find I no longer read the list because I can pick up the few relevant bits from the summary and fo

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Damian Conway wrote: Piers Cawley wrote: Acknowledgements But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6 summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses that are P6-language and P6-internals Remembering e.g. perl6 operator threads, brrr, I

Re: This week's Perl Summary

2003-01-03 Thread Damian Conway
Piers Cawley wrote: Acknowledgements But, of course, modesty forebade him from thanking the tireless Perl 6 summarizer himself, for his sterling efforts wading through the morasses that are P6-language and P6-internals, endlessly straining out the essentials for the benefit of those in the Perl