Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:08 PM 9/19/2001 -0400, John Siracusa wrote: >On 9/19/01 11:51 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > John> (HFS and HFS+ are indeed case-insensitive though) > > > > Which they *could* have fixed from the Unix side in the same way that > > MachTen did it..., and I wish they would. In MachTen, eac

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:49 PM 9/19/2001 +0100, Robin Houston wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > I'd love to have Darwin there, [...] > > > > If someone is willing to pitch in the time and effort, I'd be thrilled > > to add it to the list. > >I'm willing. Keen. I don't suppose you can do Classic Mac too, perchance?

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "John" == John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> HFS+ supports 255 character file names. Yes, the (classic Mac OS) Finder is John> hiding something from you, as are the rest of the classic Mac OS file access John> APIs, which are limited to 32 characters and weren't updated when H

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:44:34AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > > Don't use parrot-nightly; use the snapshots from cvs.perl.org > > So parrot-nightly will only be useful when we have many more features > implemented, and there's a high probability that most features in a > snapshot will actu

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Nathan Torkington
Simon Cozens writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:22:04PM +0200, H. Merijn Brand wrote: > > Can't open perl script "t/harness": No such file or directory > > MANIFEST? (using most recent parrot-nightly) > > Don't use parrot-nightly; use the snapshots from cvs.perl.org So parrot-nightly will only

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread John Siracusa
On 9/19/01 10:35 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > John> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Darwin > John> even installs on file systems that support anything less than > John> 255 character file names (e.g. HFS). > > My HFS+ drive held Darwin for at least a little while, and t

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:10 PM 9/19/2001 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: >(cast)foo = bar; syntax is *not* supported in most non-GNU C compilers: My sloppiness, I'll fix anything remaining. (It wasn't done out of any gcc-centrism--I don't even use gcc much. Just never occurred to me that it wouldn't work...)

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:15 AM 9/19/2001 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: >If the nightly builds start OK, I could add a daily report for > > HP-UX 11.00 HPc/gcc 32/64 threading/non-threading > HP-UX 10.20 HPc 32threading/non-threading > AIX 4.3.3 vac/gcc 32/64 threading/non-threading >

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "John" == John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On 9/18/01 7:26 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >> I'd suggest you "Darwin" there to be sure you're thinking about >> case-insensitive-32-char filenames John> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Darwin John> even i

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> And, maybe even more important, not all the world has gcc! Hear, hear. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On Wed 19 Sep 2001 13:10, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And, maybe even more important, not all the world has gcc! and bytecode.c l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 136 > make test_prog cc -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FI LE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I..

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-19 Thread H . Merijn Brand
On Wed 19 Sep 2001 11:15, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue 18 Sep 2001 20:43, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot > > interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of > > t

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:55 PM 9/18/2001 +0100, Philip Kendall wrote: >On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot > > interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of > > the interpreter to be consi

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-18 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >Linux (x86) >CygWin >Win32 >Tru64 >OpenVMS (Alpha) >Solaris (Sparc) >FreeBSD (x86) To clarify: we're *not* saying "these are the only platforms we care about". Parrot *will* run on many, many more platforms

Re: The core platforms list

2001-09-18 Thread Philip Kendall
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot > interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of > the interpreter to be considerd OK. They are: [...] > Solaris (Sparc) 32 bit