At 12:08 PM 9/19/2001 -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
>On 9/19/01 11:51 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > John> (HFS and HFS+ are indeed case-insensitive though)
> >
> > Which they *could* have fixed from the Unix side in the same way that
> > MachTen did it..., and I wish they would. In MachTen, eac
At 04:49 PM 9/19/2001 +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I'd love to have Darwin there, [...]
> >
> > If someone is willing to pitch in the time and effort, I'd be thrilled
> > to add it to the list.
>
>I'm willing.
Keen. I don't suppose you can do Classic Mac too, perchance?
> "John" == John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> HFS+ supports 255 character file names. Yes, the (classic Mac OS) Finder is
John> hiding something from you, as are the rest of the classic Mac OS file access
John> APIs, which are limited to 32 characters and weren't updated when H
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:44:34AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > Don't use parrot-nightly; use the snapshots from cvs.perl.org
>
> So parrot-nightly will only be useful when we have many more features
> implemented, and there's a high probability that most features in a
> snapshot will actu
Simon Cozens writes:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:22:04PM +0200, H. Merijn Brand wrote:
> > Can't open perl script "t/harness": No such file or directory
> > MANIFEST? (using most recent parrot-nightly)
>
> Don't use parrot-nightly; use the snapshots from cvs.perl.org
So parrot-nightly will only
On 9/19/01 10:35 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> John> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Darwin
> John> even installs on file systems that support anything less than
> John> 255 character file names (e.g. HFS).
>
> My HFS+ drive held Darwin for at least a little while, and t
At 01:10 PM 9/19/2001 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>(cast)foo = bar; syntax is *not* supported in most non-GNU C compilers:
My sloppiness, I'll fix anything remaining. (It wasn't done out of any
gcc-centrism--I don't even use gcc much. Just never occurred to me that it
wouldn't work...)
At 11:15 AM 9/19/2001 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>If the nightly builds start OK, I could add a daily report for
>
> HP-UX 11.00 HPc/gcc 32/64 threading/non-threading
> HP-UX 10.20 HPc 32threading/non-threading
> AIX 4.3.3 vac/gcc 32/64 threading/non-threading
>
> "John" == John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On 9/18/01 7:26 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> I'd suggest you "Darwin" there to be sure you're thinking about
>> case-insensitive-32-char filenames
John> Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Darwin
John> even i
> And, maybe even more important, not all the world has gcc!
Hear, hear.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
On Wed 19 Sep 2001 13:10, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, maybe even more important, not all the world has gcc!
and bytecode.c
l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/parrot 136 > make test_prog
cc -DDEBUGGING -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/pro/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FI
LE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I..
On Wed 19 Sep 2001 11:15, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 18 Sep 2001 20:43, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot
> > interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of
> > t
At 07:55 PM 9/18/2001 +0100, Philip Kendall wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot
> > interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of
> > the interpreter to be consi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>Linux (x86)
>CygWin
>Win32
>Tru64
>OpenVMS (Alpha)
>Solaris (Sparc)
>FreeBSD (x86)
To clarify: we're *not* saying "these are the only platforms we care
about". Parrot *will* run on many, many more platforms
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:43:07PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, folks, the following platforms are considered core for the parrot
> interpreter. That means we need to run on all of them for any release of
> the interpreter to be considerd OK. They are:
[...]
> Solaris (Sparc)
32 bit
15 matches
Mail list logo