-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 18 August 2003 10:29 am, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Packfile fun
> So long assemble.pl, it's been good to know you.
>
> http://xrl.us/puu
Google gives me an error on this:
Unable to find thread. Please recheck the URL.
-BEGIN PGP S
Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
>>>"MS" == Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> MS> This has been a major stumbling block for me in getting back
>> the MS> motivation to help with Parrot again.
>> so if that helps salve your wound, i am sure you contrib
Uri Guttman wrote:
"MS" == Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> This has been a major stumbling block for me in getting back the
MS> motivation to help with Parrot again.
so if that helps salve your wound, i am sure you contributions (past and
future) to parrot are welcomed and apprec
> "MS" == Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS> I suppose I could have provided some more explanation (I haven't
MS> read the book yet) but as the original author of IMCC & PIR, I
MS> wasn't even contacted out of courtesy to write the chapter and was
MS> informed after the book
Piers,
Regarding your Perl6 Essentials summary:
>Or, he can write code for IMCC using Parrot Intermediate Language (known
as PIR for reasons that aren't entirely clear even to one who has been
watching the mailing list since the Parrot project started)
I suppose noone has much read the README
> We're not quite in the world of ACME::DWIM, so you can't just replace
> the important stuff with ... . :-)
Maybe, but the C preprocessor isn't important, here, for itself. Otherwise I
could cheat:
grammar Grammar::Language::C::Preprocessor {
rule CompilationUnit {
FIRST { static
Luke Palmer wrote:
>
> > grammar Grammars::Languages::C::Preprocessor {
> > rule CompilationUnit {
> > ( | )*
> > }
> >
> > rule Directive {
> > ( Include
> >| Line
> >| Conditional
> >| Define
> > ) *
> > }
> >
> > rule Hash { /^\s*#\s*
> grammar Grammars::Languages::C::Preprocessor {
> rule CompilationUnit {
> ( | )*
> }
>
> rule Directive {
> ( Include
>| Line
>| Conditional
>| Define
> ) *
> }
>
> rule Hash { /^\s*#\s*/ }
> rule Include {...}
> rule Line {...
"Austin Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I.e. is it just an input stream filter?
> Doubtful.
>
> Do you want to do this at the grammar level, or the file level?
>
> If you want it at the file level, you C a translator (ooh! my
> first p6 idiom!) to the file handle.
>
> If you want it at the gramma
--- Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Austin Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $.source = (new
> Grammars::Language::C::Preprocessor).open($source);
>
> I find myself wondering if this is covered by the P6 equiv of
> TieHandle.
> I.e. is it just an input stream filter?
>
Doubt
--- David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:19:11PM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote:
>
> > Likewise:
> >
> > my $fh = open " >
> > $fh =~ / > = Grammars::Languages::Runoff::tbl(input_method
> >= Grammars::Language::Runoff::eqn(input_method
> >
"Austin Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you really want is to be able to "chain" grammars:
>
> > my $fh = open " > $fh =~ //;
>
> grammar Grammars::Languages::C {
> method init {
> SUPER::init;
>
> $.source = (new Grammars::Language::C::Preprocessor).open($source);
> }
> .
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:19:11PM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote:
> Likewise:
>
> my $fh = open "
> $fh =~ / = Grammars::Languages::Runoff::tbl(input_method
>= Grammars::Language::Runoff::eqn(input_method
> = IO::Gunzip)))>/;
Very cool.
Assuming this ran succe
--- Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Piers Cawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Parsers with Pre-processors
> > I didn't quite understand what Dave Whipp was driving at when
> > he talked about overloading the "" pattern as a way of doing
> > preprocessing of Perl 6 patterns. I didn't und
"Piers Cawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Parsers with Pre-processors
> I didn't quite understand what Dave Whipp was driving at when he
talked
> about overloading the "" pattern as a way of doing preprocessing
of
> Perl 6 patterns. I didn't understand Luke Palmer's answer either.
He
Adam Turoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:20:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>> Acknowledgements, Announcements and Apologies
>> First of all, I plead insanity for my mistake of last week's summary.
>> PONIE does not stand for 'Perl On New Internal Architecture',
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:20:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> Acknowledgements, Announcements and Apologies
> First of all, I plead insanity for my mistake of last week's summary.
> PONIE does not stand for 'Perl On New Internal Architecture', it
> obviously stands for 'Perl On New Im
17 matches
Mail list logo
