At 1:02 PM -0700 5/10/04, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... As such I've started a FAQ in
docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
Index: docs/co
At 12:40 PM -0700 5/10/04, TOGoS (via RT) wrote:
This patch adds some more questions (which I,
personally, would like to know the answers to but
don't) to docs/compiler_faq.pod. It also puts them in
nice categories. Well, I think they're nice...
Looks good--applied, thanks. Now I've more work cut o
# New Ticket Created by TOGoS
# Please include the string: [perl #29488]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29488 >
OK, this is my first patch EVAR, so feel free to chew
me out if I totally screwed it up :)
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... As such I've started a FAQ in
docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
Index: docs/compiler_faq.pod
===
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... As such I've started a FAQ in
> docs/compiler_faq.pod.
When I read that file name, I though about gcc, Win32 compilers usable
for Parrot. Could be misleading ...
leo
