Re: Testing signal handlers

2004-01-28 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Uri Guttman wrote: "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LT> The attached t/pmc/signal.t should send a SIGINT to a sleeping or LT> looping PASM test. This basically works, but the test output looks a Test::* can't handle output from forked children (it traps redirect STDOUT in t

Re: Testing signal handlers

2004-01-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:49:25PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: > Test::* can't handle output from forked children Yes, the problem is the child process can't inform the parent of how many tests it ran. The simplest way around this problem is to have the parent account for any tests run in the chil

Re: Testing signal handlers

2004-01-28 Thread Boris Sukholitko
Hi, On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:49:25PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: > > "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > LT> The attached t/pmc/signal.t should send a SIGINT to a sleeping or > LT> looping PASM test. This basically works, but the test output looks a > LT> bit ugly: >

Re: Testing signal handlers

2004-01-28 Thread Uri Guttman
> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LT> The attached t/pmc/signal.t should send a SIGINT to a sleeping or LT> looping PASM test. This basically works, but the test output looks a LT> bit ugly: LT> t/pmc/signal# No tests run! LT> t/pmc/signal