-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 04 April 2005 11:32, David Cantrell wrote:
> Tels wrote:
> > On Friday 01 April 2005 21:47, Walter Goulet wrote:
> >> I've been in contact with the author of Net-SSLeay about testing his
> >> module. One limitation I have to work with is that the
Tels wrote:
On Friday 01 April 2005 21:47, Walter Goulet wrote:
I've been in contact with the author of Net-SSLeay about testing his
module. One limitation I have to work with is that the module has to
work out of the box with perl 5.6.0 which doesn't include the
Test::Simple and Test::More modules
--- Andy Lester wrote:
> I'd throw my hands up and let it go, then. One of the key functions of
> Phalanx is to modernize the testing infrastructure of the modules we
> touch. If he needs it to stay compatible back to the relative dark
> ages, then let's just leave it that way.
Though many modul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Saturday 02 April 2005 17:14, Andy Lester wrote:
> > I'd say toss in a prerequisite for Test::Simple and be done with it.
> > Anybody who is still using 5.6.0 with no additional modules does
> > something wrong.
>
> But it's the author's choice, not our
I'd say toss in a prerequisite for Test::Simple and be done with it.
Anybody who is still using 5.6.0 with no additional modules does
something wrong.
But it's the author's choice, not ours.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 01 April 2005 21:47, Walter Goulet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been in contact with the author of Net-SSLeay about testing his
> module. One limitation I have to work with is that the module has to
> work out of the box with perl 5.6.0 which doesn't in
Well ok, but then you have to pull it off of the Phalanx 100. Either
that, or we convince the author of the benefits of upgrading the
testing infrastructure. I'm not sure what is driving him to keep the
module compatible with 5.6.0 (especially since the testing modules
were added to 5.6.2).
On Apr
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:47:36PM -0600, Walter Goulet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I've been in contact with the author of Net-SSLeay about testing his
> module. One limitation I have to work with is that the module has to
> work out of the box with perl 5.6.0 which doesn't include the
> Test::S
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:47:36PM -0600, Walter Goulet wrote:
> Finally, I wanted to confirm an assumption: I can split test.pl into a
> set of seperate t/*.t test scripts regardless of whether I'm using
> Test or Test::More.
Yes. Or neither or both.
--
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
My impression from the author was that he didn't want me bundling any
additional modules with Net-SSLeay. Maybe I don't fully understand
your suggestion...
On Apr 1, 2005 2:07 PM, Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Goulet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been in contact with the author o
Walter Goulet wrote:
Hi,
I've been in contact with the author of Net-SSLeay about testing his
module. One limitation I have to work with is that the module has to
work out of the box with perl 5.6.0 which doesn't include the
Test::Simple and Test::More modules.
I guess this limits me to using the o
11 matches
Mail list logo
