On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:17:06AM -0700, Bob Goolsby (bogoolsb) wrote:
> Actually, that is an argument for running two sets of tests, one vanilla,
> the other Tainted.
>
> And that raises the question "Who's bug is it?" if something passes the
> test package under normal conditions, but fails un
At 04:39 PM 10/21/2003 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
> weird ways when using it.
All the more reason to test with it on. :)
--
Michael G Schwern[EMAIL
Andrew Savige wrote in perl-qa :
>
> Given the differences in behaviour with taint mode, it seems to me
> that for a "taint mode test" (i.e. one with -wT in its first line)
> Test::Harness should run the test twice -- once with taint mode and
> once without. Though I suppose there might be a case
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
> > weird ways when using it.
>
> All the more reason to test with it on. :)
At this point I've become rather
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>> Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
>> weird ways when using it.
>
> All the more reason to test with it on. :)
Given the differences in behaviour with taint mode, it
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
> weird ways when using it.
All the more reason to test with it on. :)
--
Michael G Schwern[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Do not t
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>
> Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
> weird ways when using it.
I'd guess that many extensions don't handle magic properly.
Extension authors rarely add the extra logic, even if they know
what
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:24:03AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Savige wrote:
> > > I noticed in Test::Tutorial:
> > > "Taint mode is a funny thing. It's the globalest of all global features.
> > > Once you turn it on it
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:27:34PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:24:03AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > Not to mention that it's buggy as hell. For example, in various versions
> > of Perl I've used there have been rather serious bugs in the regex engine
> > when tai
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:24:03AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Savige wrote:
> > I noticed in Test::Tutorial:
> > "Taint mode is a funny thing. It's the globalest of all global features.
> > Once you turn it on it effects all code in your program and all modules
> > used
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Andrew Savige wrote:
> I noticed in Test::Tutorial:
> "Taint mode is a funny thing. It's the globalest of all global features.
> Once you turn it on it effects all code in your program and all modules
> used (and all the modules they use). If a single piece of code isn't
> tai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 20 October 2003 04:07, Andrew Savige wrote:
> I noticed in Test::Tutorial:
> "Taint mode is a funny thing. It's the globalest of all global features.
> Once you turn it on it effects all code in your program and all modules
> used (and all the mo
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:07:48PM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
> On the down-side: while taint tests seem to work fine for me with
> Perl 5.6.0 and above, I experienced problems with Perl 5.005 which
> failed with something like "cannot locate Fred/Fred.pm in @INC"
> when running taint tests. I hav
13 matches
Mail list logo
