On 4/20/06, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm thinking too hard, or maybe the results reported aren't
> exactly as clear as they probably should be. Here's an example test and
> its results as reported by Test::Harness with the TODO changes.
>
> #!perl -w
>
> use strict;
> use Te
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:36:08PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> On 4/20/06, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm thinking too hard, or maybe the results reported aren't
> > exactly as clear as they probably should be. Here's an example test and
> > its results as reported by Test::Har
On 4/20/06, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:22:33AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> > On 4/19/06, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > BTW, the patch only shows TODO pass status when no failures occur.
> > > >
> > > > Oh and obviously all of Test::Harness'es
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:22:33AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> On 4/19/06, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW, the patch only shows TODO pass status when no failures occur.
> > >
> > > Oh and obviously all of Test::Harness'es tests pass. :-)
> >
> > This patch doesn't apply against my la
On 4/19/06, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, the patch only shows TODO pass status when no failures occur.
> >
> > Oh and obviously all of Test::Harness'es tests pass. :-)
>
> This patch doesn't apply against my latest dev version of
> Test::Harness. I'm going to have to massage it
BTW, the patch only shows TODO pass status when no failures occur.
Oh and obviously all of Test::Harness'es tests pass. :-)
This patch doesn't apply against my latest dev version of
Test::Harness. I'm going to have to massage it manually.
But I like the idea. Thanks.
xoa
--
Andy Lester
