On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:01:18PM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> >>>It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
> >>>Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAML as an intermediate test-run format.
> >>
> >>Actually, Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix is what I currently use for test reports
> >>that
> >>get e
Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:01:18PM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
>
>It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
>Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAML as an intermediate test-run format.
Actually, Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix is what I currently use for test
Mark Stosberg wrote:
> On 2005-11-22, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>Stevan Little wrote:
>>
>>>Michael,
>>>
>>>You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
>>>
>>>http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
>>>
>>>It uses (among other things) Test::
On 2005-11-22, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Stevan Little wrote:
>> Michael,
>>
>> You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
>>
>> http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
>>
>> It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
>> Test::TAP::
Not at all.
Unlike CPAN Testers, this is designed with standalone components.
So as long as you can create a Distribution::Harness object and run it,
it should spit out PITA::Report XML content/files for you, without any
of the system image stuff needed.
So if you wrap up your tests as somet
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-23 01:40]:
And XML was designed for, and still remains VERY good at, doing
neutral format data interchange.
Another option if you want a lightweight format for structured
data is JSON. XML is very nice for documents, particularl
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-23 01:40]:
> And XML was designed for, and still remains VERY good at, doing
> neutral format data interchange.
Another option if you want a lightweight format for structured
data is JSON. XML is very nice for documents, particularly with
mixed content;
Do you still think that YAML is a good intermediate format choice? Do you think
an integration with other standard utilities to produce YAML would be possible
(prove, etc)?
YAML has a few ... issues. :/
I've laid them out before at http://cpanratings.perl.org/dist/YAML
Brian has said that the
Michael,
On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
Stevan Little wrote:
Michael,
You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAM
Stevan Little wrote:
> Michael,
>
> You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
>
> http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
>
> It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
> Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAML as an intermediate test-run format.
Actual
Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Michael
>
> There's existing work happening in this area you may want to get
> involved in. We even have a draft XML schema that does exactly what you
> are talking about.
>
> Go read http://ali.as/pita/
Definitely an interesting project. It is much wider in scope than my
Michael,
You might want to look at some of the work on the Pugs test suite.
http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl
It uses (among other things) Test::TAP::Model and
Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and uses YAML as an intermediate test-run format.
Stevan
On Nov 22, 2005, at 2:11 PM, Mi
Michael
There's existing work happening in this area you may want to get
involved in. We even have a draft XML schema that does exactly what you
are talking about.
Go read http://ali.as/pita/
Then come hang out on irc://irc.perl.org/#pita
Adam K
Michael Peters wrote:
Hello all,
I'm in th
13 matches
Mail list logo