On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 03:17 PM 11/16/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >I like the idea of splitting out some things (such as dynaloading) into
> >separate directories, instead of a single monolithic platform.c file.
> >Whether *every* non-portable function needs its own
At 03:17 PM 11/16/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>I like the idea of splitting out some things (such as dynaloading) into
>separate directories, instead of a single monolithic platform.c file.
>Whether *every* non-portable function needs its own directory is a
>different question. I suspect no
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, James Mastros wrote:
> Hey all.
> This implements a platforms system similar to what we were discussing
> earlier: each interface is a sepperate file, independent of the others, the
> hints file specifies what interfaces we use. This does create a large
> number of files,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, James Mastros wrote:
> Hey all.
> This implements a platforms system similar to what we were discussing
> earlier: each interface is a sepperate file, independent of the others, the
> hints file specifies what interfaces we use. This does create a large
> number of files,
