John Siracusa writes:
> > I think we're due out in reasonably good alpha/beta shape for the summer.
> Heh, the phrase "suitable vague" springs to mind... :)
There's a good reason for that, for why I've tried hard to avoid
giving promises of when things would be ready. Have you seen Apache 2
and
> So I know for the first-stage rollout, does Apache's module system support
> Apache managing filehandles and modules calling apache's I/O routines, or
> does it just do weird magic with I/O on normal filehandles?
I'm pretty sure that for a simple implementation, we only need to worry
about "
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 10/27/01 7:08 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I think we're due out in reasonably good alpha/beta shape for the summer.
>
> Heh, the phrase "suitably vague" springs to mind... :)
Ah, and you thought it was my *technical* skills that got me this job!
>
On 10/27/01 10:34 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 10/27/01 7:08 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> I think we're due out in reasonably good alpha/beta shape for the summer.
>
> Heh, the phrase "suitable vague" springs to mind... :)
s/e v/y v/; # oops :)
-John
On 10/27/01 7:08 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I think we're due out in reasonably good alpha/beta shape for the summer.
Heh, the phrase "suitable vague" springs to mind... :)
(which year is that again? ;)
-John
At 06:09 PM 10/27/2001 -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
>On 10/27/01 4:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > At 06:27 AM 10/27/2001 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
> >> I think Robert and I are planning to get mod_parrot to work as soon as
> >> parrot has some kin
On 10/27/01 4:22 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 06:27 AM 10/27/2001 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
>> I think Robert and I are planning to get mod_parrot to work as soon as
>> parrot has some kind of I/O. :-)
>
> Darned soon now.
>
> So I know for the f
At 06:27 AM 10/27/2001 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
>
>[...]
> > If the 0.02/0.03/0.04 versions of parrot leak, it's not that big a deal
> > since it's not like we've got a long-running persistent interpreter like
> > mod_parrot or anything... ;-)
>
>I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes:
[...]
> If the 0.02/0.03/0.04 versions of parrot leak, it's not that big a deal
> since it's not like we've got a long-running persistent interpreter like
> mod_parrot or anything... ;-)
I think Robert and I are planning to get mod_parrot to work as soo
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:39:17PM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > *) Scalar PMCs
> > *) Simple I/O
> > *) A simple arena allocation system
0.03
> > *) Multiple interpreter & thread creation
> > *) Garbage collection
0.04
That's to say, 0.03 won't be released without the above three things
At 12:39 PM 10/23/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Is there a good reason to delay allocation until after the things that
>allocate memory have been written?
Yep. If the interface is in place, which it pretty much is, we can stub in
the allocation and deallocation stuff. For the moment it c
Dan Sugalski writes:
> Okay, here's a tentative list 'o stuff that is in the works for Parrot 0.03
> (and possibly 0.04):
>
> *) Scalar PMCs
> *) Simple I/O
> *) Multiple interpreter & thread creation
> *) A simple arena allocation system
> *) Garbage collection
Sweet! I guess Simon and you sh
12 matches
Mail list logo
