Rod Adams wrote:
I have the philosophical problem with your use of junctions in this
context due to the fact that you are completely ignoring the predicate
of the junction. The C< all(...) == one(...) > is an excellent use of
YES, and much clearer than when this test is buried under code
that ha
Sam Vilain wrote:
I've changed examples/sendmoremoney.p6 in the pugs distribution to use
junctions correctly to demonstrate that they *can* be used to solve these
sorts of problems, and that it is just a matter of semantics and writing
code correctly.
However, poor semantics can make the task of wr
Larry Wall writes:
> There's no doubt that the QM view of extended entanglement is very
> useful. After all, that's what the whole universe runs on. But most
> mortals will want the classical view to be the default, so we'll
> require some kind of explicit markup or pragma if you want to extend
>
There's no doubt that the QM view of extended entanglement is very
useful. After all, that's what the whole universe runs on. But most
mortals will want the classical view to be the default, so we'll
require some kind of explicit markup or pragma if you want to extend
entanglement further out tha
