Re: Revisiting parrot_get_config_string

2006-01-05 Thread Nick Glencross
On 1/5/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick Glencross wrote: > > The first patch modifies the parrot VM so as not to call > > parrot_get_config_string on startup, which currently resides in the > > calling executable. Instead, the executable (optionally) calls > > Parrot_set_conf

Re: Revisiting parrot_get_config_string

2006-01-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nick Glencross wrote: Guys, I shall shortly update the relevant calls, but I'd just like to check a few things first. These patches update the patches in #37303 and #36836, relating to parrot_get_config_string and cygwin dynclasses. The first patch modifies the parrot VM so as not to call parr