On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Andrew Savige [2003-11-15 14:51]:
> > I took a quick look a mod_perl and Template Toolkit (TT).
> > TT has a:
> > lib/Template/Test.pm
> > which looks wrong to me (should that not be under t/lib instead?).
>
> Template::Test contains a bunch of
* Andrew Savige [2003-11-15 14:51]:
> I took a quick look a mod_perl and Template Toolkit (TT).
> TT has a:
> lib/Template/Test.pm
> which looks wrong to me (should that not be under t/lib instead?).
Template::Test contains a bunch of (pre-Test::More) testing methods that
are geared towards wri
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:51:26PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > I use t/lib so the top level t/ directory doesn't get cluttered (and for
> > compatibility with the Perl core which may be important later for A::T).
>
> Yes, I like that. Should I call it:
> t/lib/Test
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I use t/lib so the top level t/ directory doesn't get cluttered (and for
> compatibility with the Perl core which may be important later for A::T).
Yes, I like that. Should I call it:
t/lib/Test/Archive/Tar...
or:
t/lib/Archive/Tar/Test...
or something else?
I took
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:12:01PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> Which model should I follow? Or are there better models out there?
Well, since you're not a core module you don't have to worry about the
PERL_CORE stuff. So just put your .pm file somewhere under t and use lib.
I use t/lib so the
