Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote: At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote: Jonathan Worthington: work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't shipping binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-12 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
>Executable distro, I plan that you will just unzip it > where you want it. Shucks, my bad (~: For a moment, I was totally convinced that we did need to make install the distro (~: Sorry. >Sorry, looks like I've caused confusion. That bit of my email was about >getting "make install" to work wh

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-10 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
> Is it as simple as checking whether the OS is Windows, and setting %options > to contain appropriate paths, e.g. It's no use while checking if the OS is Windows, 'cause the distribution is intended for only Win 32 users. So you should predefine the hash below. > %options = ( buildprefix => '',

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-09 Thread Jonathan Worthington
- Original Message - From: "Vladimir Lipskiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "perl6-internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:47 AM Subject: Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone d

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-05 Thread Jonathan Worthington
On Tuesday, August 05 at 2003 2:40 PM, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 12:12 AM -0400 8/5/03, Melvin Smith wrote: > >At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote: > >>Jonathan Worthington: > >>> work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled > >>> binaries, not yet. Parrot is sti

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-04 Thread Brent Dax
Jonathan Worthington: > work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled > binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't shipping > binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I shouldn't do a ZIP with the executables > in? But in that case I guess there's no poin

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-04 Thread Melvin Smith
At 11:37 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Brent Dax wrote: Jonathan Worthington: > work something out. :-) However, Brent said "If you mean precompiled > binaries, not yet. Parrot is still under development, so we aren't shipping > binaries.", so I'm guessing maybe I shouldn't do a ZIP with the executables >

Re: Re[2]: parrot, win32, stand-alone distribution, separate Parrot maillist

2003-08-04 Thread Jonathan Worthington
Hi, > Tuesday, August 5, 2003, 12:28:16 AM, you wrote: > > JW> What needs to go into the ZIP? My guesses are:- > JW> - parrot executable > JW> - imcc executable > JW> - The docs directory > JW> - The examples directory > JW> - The languages directory > JW> If you want regular