Re: Re: Re: test of get_namespace opcode vs. arrays

2006-07-01 Thread Matt Diephouse
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've rooted out that bug, but then discovered there's no way left to designate the root HLL namespace, so I've invented .namespace # no key to mean the HLL root. That resolves the other ticket I opened yesterday (good). But I'd prefer to have C< .

Re: Re: test of get_namespace opcode vs. arrays

2006-07-01 Thread Chip Salzenberg
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:30:40PM -0700, Matt Diephouse wrote: > Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The actual bug you've found seems unrelated to the use of the array of > >strings (vs. a key), as substituting the key version: > > $P0 = get_namespace [''] > >still fails. Debugging i

Re: Re: test of get_namespace opcode vs. arrays

2006-07-01 Thread Matt Diephouse
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The actual bug you've found seems unrelated to the use of the array of strings (vs. a key), as substituting the key version: $P0 = get_namespace [''] still fails. Debugging in progress. It looks like IMCC treats C< .namespace [''] > as the root H