Re: Re: Re: resizablepmcarray, assign.

2006-08-08 Thread Matt Diephouse
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FWIW, the Common Lisp system I'm writing takes a third tack. It defines a ParrotObject container associated with the name that refers indirectly to the current value. Of course, Common Lisp "symbol" objects are part of the language spec (and aliasing is not

Re: Re: resizablepmcarray, assign.

2006-08-05 Thread Bob Rogers
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 01:22:49 -0400 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This tweak may break other stuff (I didn't check), so take it with a > grain of salt. However, this may be a hint that you are better off > using PMCs as

Re: Re: resizablepmcarray, assign.

2006-08-04 Thread Matt Diephouse
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I finally found the definition of __set (my tagfile-building recipe was deficient), and, on a hunch, made the tweak shown below, with the following result: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ../../parrot tcl.pbc -e 'set a [list a b]; set x $a; set a b; puts $a;