Re: Re: Re: Re: RFC: Consolidate stack-unwinding code

2006-09-23 Thread Matt Diephouse
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try the attached patch . . . That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not necessarily urgent that Tcl w

Re: Re: Re: RFC: Consolidate stack-unwinding code

2006-09-23 Thread Bob Rogers
From: "Matt Diephouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try the attached patch . . . That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not necessarily urgent that Tcl work in trunk. I'm okay with waiting a

Re: Re: Re: RFC: Consolidate stack-unwinding code

2006-09-23 Thread Matt Diephouse
Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try the attached patch. If it works, then we have a problem, because here's the original comment (which I deleted) that went with this line of code: /* * During interpreter creation there is an initial context * and th