Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax

2000-08-24 Thread Ilya Martynov
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Peter Scott wrote: PS> From the beginning of the posting you're quoting: PS> PS> This RFC has been merged into RFC 88. The text of the last version PS> prior to the merge is left below for archival purposes only. Anyone PS> interested in browsing this for historical reasons

Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax

2000-08-24 Thread Peter Scott
At 07:54 PM 8/24/00 +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote: >PRL> Exceptions are objects belonging to some C class. Cing >PRL> an exception creates the object; therefore, C above is just a >PRL> class name (possibly including some C<::>). >PRL> >PRL> The C function is just syntactic sugar for creating a new

Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax

2000-08-24 Thread Ilya Martynov
PRL> Exceptions are objects belonging to some C class. Cing PRL> an exception creates the object; therefore, C above is just a PRL> class name (possibly including some C<::>). PRL> PRL> The C function is just syntactic sugar for creating a new PRL> exception class;it merely amounts to C<@EXCEPTI