Re: RFC 274 (v1) Generalised Additions to Regexs

2000-09-28 Thread Hugo
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Richard Proctor" writes: :> I'd be more inclined to have callbacks registered for a word: that :> way we can complain earlier when two modules try to register the :> same word. Then at regexp-compile time we parse out the word :> following the (+ and immediately know who t

Re: RFC 274 (v1) Generalised Additions to Regexs

2000-09-27 Thread Richard Proctor
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/, Perl6 RFC > Librarian writes: > :Given that expansion of regexes could include (+...) and (*...) I > :have been thinking about providing a general purpose way of adding > :functionality. Hence I propose that the entire (+...) syntax is > :kept free from formal specifi

Re: RFC 274 (v1) Generalised Additions to Regexs

2000-09-27 Thread Hugo
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Perl6 RFC Librarian writes: :Given that expansion of regexes could include (+...) and (*...) I have :been thinking about providing a general purpose way of adding :functionality. Hence I propose that the entire (+...) syntax is :kept free from formal specification for this