Re: RFC 236 (v1) Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used

2000-09-17 Thread Bart Lateur
On 16 Sep 2000 03:36:45 -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: >The current method in which C<__WARN__> and C<__DIE__> signal handlers are >used is limited in 2ways: > >=over 8 > >=item It does not allow them to accept robust parameter lists. > >=item It does not allow for multiple layers of handlers.

Re: RFC 236 (v1) Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used

2000-09-16 Thread Simon Cozens
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:36:45AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > The current method in which C<__WARN__> and C<__DIE__> signal handlers are > used is limited in 2ways: > > =over 8 > > =item It does not allow them to accept robust parameter lists. > > =item It does not allow for multiple l

Re: RFC 236 (v1) Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used

2000-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:36:45AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: > Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used I don't think this is enough to repair $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__}. I know some people out there have some very strong feelings about these pseudo-signals. It may

Re: RFC 236 (v1) Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used

2000-09-15 Thread Uri Guttman
> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MGS> On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:36:45AM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: >> Change the way $SIG{__WARN__} and $SIG{__DIE__} are used MGS> I don't think this is enough to repair $SIG{__WARN__} and MGS> $SIG{__DIE__}. I know so