Re: RFC: library entry name collision

2002-10-07 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 9:37 PM -0400 9/29/02, Mike Lambert wrote: > >intlist is not the only culprit. ./classes/key.c and ./key.c have a > >similar problem. > > Then let's start a convention. > > Classes start with a CL_ prefix, encodings with an EN_ prefix, and > charact

RE: RFC: library entry name collision

2002-10-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:51 PM -0700 10/5/02, Brent Dax wrote: >Dan Sugalski: ># At 9:37 PM -0400 9/29/02, Mike Lambert wrote: ># >intlist is not the only culprit. ./classes/key.c and ./key.c have a ># >similar problem. ># ># Then let's start a convention. ># ># Classes start with a CL_ prefix, encodings with an EN_

RE: RFC: library entry name collision

2002-10-05 Thread Brent Dax
Dan Sugalski: # At 9:37 PM -0400 9/29/02, Mike Lambert wrote: # >intlist is not the only culprit. ./classes/key.c and ./key.c have a # >similar problem. # # Then let's start a convention. # # Classes start with a CL_ prefix, encodings with an EN_ prefix, and # character set stuff starts with a

Re: RFC: library entry name collision

2002-10-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:37 PM -0400 9/29/02, Mike Lambert wrote: >intlist is not the only culprit. ./classes/key.c and ./key.c have a >similar problem. Then let's start a convention. Classes start with a CL_ prefix, encodings with an EN_ prefix, and character set stuff starts with a CS_ prefix. --

Re: RFC: library entry name collision

2002-09-29 Thread Mike Lambert
> I was beating my head on the wall yesterday trying to figure out why > an intlist test was failing on a freshly updated source tree. (I > rarely use 'make clean', because that's almost always just covering up > dependency problems.) I'll leave out the gory details, but the problem > boiled down