Ah, this explains why I wasn't able to duplicate the bug on the SPARC
box Sun loaned to us. It's a brand-new box, with the latest Perl, etc.
Is there a way we could get one of our Cage Cleaners access to the box
you're testing on? Or duplicate the configuration? I'll check with
Robert to see i
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:01:54AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
> - I ran into one bit of strangeness with the assignment operator on
> simple strings (it was generating an 'assign' opcode with 3 arguments
> for the source code "$x = 'test'"). I solved it by setting 'pasttype' to
> 'assign', but
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:17:48PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 0:37, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> >That's cool. In that case I'll commit the test suite from perl-1.0_16
> >as TODO tests to the Punie tree, if that's okay with you. :)
>
> Most welcome. I'm following a naming conven
On Jul 12, 2005, at 0:37, Autrijus Tang wrote:
That's cool. In that case I'll commit the test suite from perl-1.0_16
as TODO tests to the Punie tree, if that's okay with you. :)
Most welcome. I'm following a naming convention in the t/ directory of
changing the original "io.print"-style file
Autrijus Tang schrieb:
If the goal is to demonstrate the capability of the upcoming expression
parser and minimal AST, I think "bc", the arbitrary precision calculator
language, is a good candidate.
Indeed it is. The nice thing about 'bc' is that is fairly simple, but
still has variables and
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
needs trunk rev 8598 for some added NCI signatures in src/call_list.txt.
or branches/leo-ctx5 r8599.
leo
Allison Randal wrote:
I'd like to add Punie to the Parrot repository.
Great. And for more fun I've created the basics of a NCI interface [1]
for ast functions. Heavily underdocumented and unfinished (as of an hour
hacking time ;-), but maybe someone takes it over and continues it. It
needs t
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:43:55PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> >As Schwern will attest, Perl 1 is a quite complicated language, with
> >nullary, unary, binary and ternary functions, arrays, hashes, pattern
> >matches, transliteration, format, loop control and labels.
>
> As a test case for the
On Jul 11, 2005, at 21:41, Autrijus Tang wrote:
Cool! However, I wonder if Punie is indeed targetting Perl 1.
As Schwern will attest, Perl 1 is a quite complicated language, with
nullary, unary, binary and ternary functions, arrays, hashes, pattern
matches, transliteration, format, loop contro
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Is it Punie's goal to support all of those semantic constructs? If not,
> maybe call it something else than Perl 1, to avoid confusion? :)
(more bikesheding)
If the goal is to demonstrate the capability of the upcoming expression
p
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:35:11PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> I'd like to add Punie to the Parrot repository. It's a first step
> toward a compiler for Perl 1 running on Parrot. Currently it's *very*
> simple: it only parses and compiles a single statement printing a
> single digit -- but it
11 matches
Mail list logo
