On Dec 20, 2007 9:27 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are certainly plenty of organization schemes we could use
> for this, but one that leaps to my mind is to organize tests based
> loosely on where the feature is described in the synopses or the
> camel book (the p5 camel
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:27:14AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: I'm thinking of this organization scheme as primarily a guiding
: principle and not something to be strictly applied. For example,
: I wouldn't advocate a strict one-to-one correspondence between
: subdirectories and major headi
