On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:05:30AM -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> Also, looking through the gcc manpage, one thing caught my eye about
> optimizing, with regards to CG and CGP. "Note: When compiling a
> program using computed gotos, a GCC extension, you may get better
> runtime performance if
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:57 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
There's a benchmark of Ruby implementations at
http://www.antoniocangiano.com/articles/2007/02/19/ruby-
implementations-shootout-ruby-vs-yarv-vs-jruby-vs-gardens-point-ruby-
net-vs-rubinius-vs-cardinal
(or http://xrl.us/uy5m )
There's a c
The cardinal numbers are most likely all bogus.
I'm surprised that any benchmarks ran at all.
The current cardinal implementation is extremely minimal. Basically
simple arithmetic.
Kevin
Nicholas Clark wrote:
There's a benchmark of Ruby implementations at
http://www.antoniocangiano.com/arti
