On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:46:21PM -0400, Millsa Erlas wrote:
>
> Being a Perl 5 user myself, I believe that it would be the best idea to
> write the final Perl 6 compiler targetting Parrot ideally in Perl 6 or
> at least some other higher-high level language such as Haskell.
There's been a fair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So are you suggesting that Ponie be written in Perl 6 or Perl 5? If you
want to remain consistent with the self hosting approach and maximize
the Perl 5 userbase, the Ponie compiler Perl should be written in Perl
5, and thus self hosted as well via itself on Parrot. If
On 27 Jun 2005, at 15:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So are you suggesting that Ponie be written in Perl 6 or Perl 5?
If you
Ponie is being written in C. As it stands, it's a refactoring of the
current perl code base to
use Parrot internals. When all the intended changes have finished,
i
So are you suggesting that Ponie be written in Perl 6 or Perl 5? If you
want to remain consistent with the self hosting approach and maximize
the Perl 5 userbase, the Ponie compiler Perl should be written in Perl
5, and thus self hosted as well via itself on Parrot. If this were the
case, work on
"Millsa Erlas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A self-hosting Perl 6 will require of course an implementation of Perl 6
in another language. Pugs seems to be quite far ahead in this respect,
quite a bit has already been accomplished with Pugs so it would seem to
me to be most efficient and quick to tu
