Jens Rieks wrote:
I've added them to experimental.ops, random.t is now in t/op/
We still need to consider what's an opcode and what not. We are going to
blow reasonable code size soon.
leo
Hi,
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 20:23, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:54, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > A simple implementation of rand() and srand() which may not be ideal for
> > Perl. Also included is the test file for random ops. If anyone can think
> > of a good way to ALWAYS know th
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 09:54, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> A simple implementation of rand() and srand() which may not be ideal for
> Perl. Also included is the test file for random ops. If anyone can think
> of a good way to ALWAYS know that a number we got back was "random",
> throw that into the test ;
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 10:01, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Thats the reason why we have a "Random" PMC (classes/random.pmc).
>
> I'am still not sure if we need an rand/srand OP for random numbers. As you
> already mentioned, srand uses a global state and I belief that it will cause
> trouble earlier or l
Hi!
On Wednesday 28 April 2004 15:54, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> The real concern is that Perl and
> Foolanguage might both srand(), but that's not something I'm gonna think
> too hard about just now and probably is a matter for library maintainers
> in those languages anyway.
Thats the reason why we
