On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 03:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Not very wrong, but ... Anyway the syntax is:
>
> Px["Rect"; 0; "x"] # rect[0].x named access of "Rect"
> Px[ 0 ; 2; "h"] # rect[2].h idx
>
> Constructions differs too.
> Please have a look at the test.
Ahh, that makes sense after s
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No problem. Fair warning, though: nci_test doesn't build by default on
> Linux PPC. I had to build it manually then copy it into
> runtime/parrot/dynext/.
That's the current procedure, yes. I don't know, if all platforms
support dynamic loading - probably
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 02:13, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Can you provide some test code (s. t/pmc/nci.t and src/nci_test.c) for
> signatures similar to the real:
> > extern DECLSPEC void SDLCALL SDL_UpdateRects
> > (SDL_Surface *screen, int numrects, SDL_Rect *rects);
No problem. F
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the secret syntax for passing and retriving arrays of things to
> and from NCI? I have this signature:
There is no secret syntax:
,--[ docs/pmc/struct.pod ]-
|Array Size
|The second initiali
