On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Nigel Sandever wrote:
> I struck me a while back that there is a contradiction in idea of a shared,
> 'my' variable.
>
> I want to say lexical, but a var declared with 'our' is in some sense lexical.
Shared-between-threads and shared-between-scopes are orthogonal properties;
u
15/04/2005 10:35:56, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nigel Sandever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> When a sub that closes over a variable
>
>> my $closure = 0;
>> sub do_something {
>> return $closure++:
>> }
>
>> is called from two threads, do the threads
Nigel Sandever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When a sub that closes over a variable
> my $closure = 0;
> sub do_something {
> return $closure++:
> }
> is called from two threads, do the threads share a single closure or
> each get their own separate closure?
AFAIK
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:17:39 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MrJoltCola)
wrote:
> At 05:57 PM 3/31/2005, Nigel Sandever wrote:
> >Is Parrot bytecode reentrant?
>
> Yes.
>
> >That is, if I want to have two instances of a class in each of two
> >threads, will
> >the bytecode for the class need to be lo
At 05:57 PM 3/31/2005, Nigel Sandever wrote:
Is Parrot bytecode reentrant?
Yes.
That is, if I want to have two instances of a class in each of two
threads, will
the bytecode for the class need to be loaded twice?
No, just once.
Also, will it be possible to pass objects (handles/references) between
