Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-09-17 Thread Robert
What happened to the Pixigreg site? I have not been able to get to it for a while now. Robert

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-09-17 Thread Grégoire Péan
Hi, I had problems with my host and domain name. The new site is: http://pxperl.com Update your bookmarks! :) Regards, Grégoire

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-09 Thread Robert
Grégoire Péan wrote: Sorry Gmail hid your last email Robert. I installed PXPerl. When I go to install DBD::SQLite I get "make errors" and it won't install. Since I have never dealt with this on Windows, do I talk to the PXPerl guy(s) or the DBD::SQLite guy? I am guessing that DBD::SQLite doesn

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Grégoire Péan
Hello, As regards to the benefits over ActivePerl, yes, PXPerl is faster for most scripts, as perlbench reports it. Besides, PXPerl has many more modules already compiled and installed than ActivePerl has. And above all, PXPerl has Parrot and Pugs inside; if you want to play with Perl 6 language w

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Grégoire Péan
Sorry Gmail hid your last email Robert. > I installed PXPerl. When I go to install DBD::SQLite I get "make errors" and > it won't install. Since I have never dealt with this on Windows, do I talk > to the PXPerl guy(s) or the DBD::SQLite guy? I am guessing that DBD::SQLite > doesn't like nmake or

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Robert
I guess I didn't post my question right. I installed PXPerl. When I go to install DBD::SQLite I get "make errors" and it won't install. Since I have never dealt with this on Windows, do I talk to the PXPerl guy(s) or the DBD::SQLite guy? I am guessing that DBD::SQLite doesn't like nmake or mingw o

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:39:41AM -0400, Robert wrote: > Here is a question out of ignorance then. I currently use ActiveState but > the ability to use CPAN vs PPM is kind of nice. Since AS only releases stuff > as binaries, they work. Since I have to compile with PXPerl am I going to > have probl

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Robert
Here is a question out of ignorance then. I currently use ActiveState but the ability to use CPAN vs PPM is kind of nice. Since AS only releases stuff as binaries, they work. Since I have to compile with PXPerl am I going to have problems with nmake on Windows (since most modules lean toward beind

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Robert wrote: > Just started here and I found PXPerl. What are the benefits of this over the > ActiveState version? Supposedly it's built with Intel C compiler, so it's a bit faster; also you can choose among VC++, GCC and Intel C to compile further CPAN m

Re: PXPerl 5.8.7-4 released with Windows binaries of Pugs 6.2.9

2005-08-08 Thread Robert
Just started here and I found PXPerl. What are the benefits of this over the ActiveState version? Robert