Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 1:43 PM +0200 8/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>We currently have two integer PMCs, we need another one for Python.
>>But before just copy&paste another file, I'd really have done that
>>right.
> I think what we need's a policy here. Larry's weighed in
At 1:43 PM +0200 8/10/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
We currently have two integer PMCs, we need another one for Python.
But before just copy&paste another file, I'd really have done that
right.
I think what we need's a policy here. Larry's weighed in on what
Perl's going to want, which is cool. (In
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:43:37PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: We need offical PDDs about the behavior of our PMCs. I hope that Perl6
: types will be the same as Perl5 types.
Well, assuming that Perl 6 is like Perl 5 is often a good first
approximation, but in this case we're thinking that In
