Re: PMC's and high level languages

2002-07-25 Thread David M. Lloyd
I can comment on a bit of this at least :) On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Melvin Smith wrote: > It is not clear to me yet that there needs to be a 1-to-1 correlation > from PMC's to upper level "classes". There won't be. In general, there well be far fewer PMC classes than upper-level classes. Also, as

Re: PMC's

2002-07-02 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:05 AM +0100 7/1/02, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote: >Hi. >Some questions I got when start looking to PMC's: > >- Is there planned a set PMC? If not, a parrot application can't create > it's own PMC? Yup, there's a planned set, but I don't think we've ever put down a list of the minima

Re: PMC's

2002-01-24 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:25 AM + 1/23/02, Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes wrote: > Hellows > > Can anybody give me a simple but complete explanation of the >PMC register >type? Thanks Sure--a PMC register is, in C terms: struct PMC *; And the register set is just an array of PMC pointers. If tha