On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Michael Scott wrote:
>
> All that metadata up front in the PDDs is a bit off-putting. I'm
> thinking of going through all of them and putting it at the end. Any
> objections?
Well, I've just committed the version I posted pretty much as-is, but
feel free to make any changes
All that metadata up front in the PDDs is a bit off-putting. I'm
thinking of going through all of them and putting it at the end. Any
objections?
Also, throughout the distribution we use variously TITLE (aka TITEL)
and NAME with and without the file path.
I've been using
=head1 NAME
path/f
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> OK, here's a rewritten version of PDD 0, which reflects my view of
> the role that the PDDs currently play in Parrot development.
> Comments welcome.
Let's try that again, with the the PDD actually attached this time...
Simon
--
OK, here's a rewritten version of PDD 0, which reflects my view of
the role that the PDDs currently play in Parrot development.
Comments welcome.
Simon
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tim Bunce wrote:
> Did you forget to add "Volunteers wanted for each of these" ?
>
Well, I'm going to try to tackle some of it, but since I have minimal
CFT at the moment, any volunteers would be very welcome.
Simon
Did you forget to add "Volunteers wanted for each of these" ?
Tim.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:17:50PM -0500, Simon Glover wrote:
>
> PDD 0 (intro. to PDDs):
>
>Very, very out of date; I think it actually pre-dates Parrot
>
> PDD 1 (overview of Parrot):
>
>Not obviously out-of-date,
