Re: PDD for the debugger API

2001-08-26 Thread Ken Fox
Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > DS> At 03:22 PM 8/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >> i didn't see any references to support debugging an external perl > >> process. ... > > DS> Good point. ... listen on some port/pipe/do

Re: PDD for the debugger API

2001-08-26 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Ken Fox wrote: > Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> At 03:22 PM 8/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > >> i didn't see any references to support debugging an external perl > > >> process. ... > > >

Re: PDD for the debugger API

2001-08-26 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> At 03:22 PM 8/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >> i didn't see any references to support debugging an external perl >> process. this should be designed in from the beginning, so the debugger >> API can be designed to work locally

Re: PDD for the debugger API

2001-08-25 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 03:22 PM 8/18/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: >i didn't see any references to support debugging an external perl >process. this should be designed in from the beginning, so the debugger >API can be designed to work locally and over a pipe. the pipe can >support an rpc or message interface which

Re: PDD for the debugger API

2001-08-18 Thread Uri Guttman
i didn't see any references to support debugging an external perl process. this should be designed in from the beginning, so the debugger API can be designed to work locally and over a pipe. the pipe can support an rpc or message interface which is wrapped by the shared debugger API. uri -- Ur