Simon Cozens:
# Clinton A. Pierce:
# > No line number, no context, nearly impossible to find to debug. I
# > think you're right, and you were given a pig in a poke.
#
# Thanks, Clint and Jeff. I'll be sure not to contribute anything again.
God, Simon, get over it. You might very well say the s
Simon Cozens wrote:
>
> Jeff:
> > > >Well, it's unhappy when you do lots of things. The code I was given was
> > > >not as complete/functional as I had been led to believe, inasmuch as it
>
> Eh, I didn't lead you to believe anything, and in fact I think I said it had
> portability issues.
Many
At 10:29 AM 5/19/2002 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> > > Unparsable argument, starting from '"', QUOTE
> > > No line number, no context, nearly impossible to find to debug.
>
>That's an internal error with the assembler, shouldn't happen. It
>suggests the string regexp is broken. I delibera
Jeff:
> > >Well, it's unhappy when you do lots of things. The code I was given was
> > >not as complete/functional as I had been led to believe, inasmuch as it
Eh, I didn't lead you to believe anything, and in fact I think I said it had
portability issues.
> > Unparsable argument, start
Clinton A. Pierce:
> No line number, no context, nearly impossible to find to debug.
> I think you're right, and you were given a pig in a poke.
Thanks, Clint and Jeff. I'll be sure not to contribute anything again.
--
Life's a switch() and then you die().
Clinton A Pierce wrote:
>
> At 09:27 PM 5/18/2002 -0400, Jeff wrote:
> > > So the new assembler's unhappy. Suggestions?
> >
> >Well, it's unhappy when you do lots of things. The code I was given was
> >not as complete/functional as I had been led to believe, inasmuch as it
> >doesn't live past t
At 09:27 PM 5/18/2002 -0400, Jeff wrote:
> > So the new assembler's unhappy. Suggestions?
>
>Well, it's unhappy when you do lots of things. The code I was given was
>not as complete/functional as I had been led to believe, inasmuch as it
>doesn't live past test series 2 without some major tweaks
Jeff wrote:
>
> Clinton A Pierce wrote:
> >
> > So here I am, hacking BASIC to use keyed PMC's for variables to make it
> > blazingly fast when I find out that to do this I need to use the new
> > assembler. So I pop into lib\parrot and proceed with the build and I get
> > this mess:
> >
> --sni
Clinton A Pierce wrote:
>
> So here I am, hacking BASIC to use keyed PMC's for variables to make it
> blazingly fast when I find out that to do this I need to use the new
> assembler. So I pop into lib\parrot and proceed with the build and I get
> this mess:
>
--snip--
>
> So the new assembler
