Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-05-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >-> (* 2 3.2) >9.6 >-> (+ 1.2 3) > I'm not sure what kind of magic you worked last time with Integers, > Leo, but would you mind working it again? (Or pointing me in the right > direction so that I can fix it myself. :) Short answer: will be f

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-30 Thread Cory Spencer
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Matt Diephouse wrote: -> (defun (square x) (* x x)) T -> (square 2) *** ERROR: SQUARE is not a function name A quick follow-up - I've just checked in code implementing some primitive macros, so if you wanted to give (defun ...) a go again, you should find that it works now. (

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 10:45:17 -0600 (MDT) > -> (defun (square x) (* x x)) > [...] > *** ERROR: SQUARE is not a function name > > Is that because (a) that's not implemented yet or (b) I'm doing > something wrong? I haven't found the t

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Cory Spencer
-> (defun (square x) (* x x)) [...] *** ERROR: SQUARE is not a function name Is that because (a) that's not implemented yet or (b) I'm doing something wrong? I haven't found the time to delve into the source yet. Oops, that wasn't supposed to have made it in there - I haven't finished up macros y

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.sprocket.org/pcl/pcl-0.1.0.tar.gz Below is a patch against 0.1.0 - handle a command line file argument: $ cat t.lisp (print (+ 2 3)) $ ../parrot lisp.imc t.lisp 5 - use a FixedPMCArray for cons - much faster _LIST_LENGTH (not that I

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Lars Balker Rasmussen
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 07:59:57AM +0200, Uwe Voelker wrote: > >I'd like to announce the creation of the Parrot Common Lisp project, > > Let's port emacs to it :-) Erik Naggum, is that you? -- Lars Balker RasmussenConsult::Perl

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Uwe Voelker
I'd like to announce the creation of the Parrot Common Lisp project, Let's port emacs to it :-) Bye, Uwe

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -> (* 2 3) > 9 See my reply to Cory's mail. leo

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-21 Thread Matt Diephouse
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For examples of what it can currently do, look in the lisp/ subdirectory > in the files loaded at run time (bootstrap.l system.l and primitives.l). > > Anyone who would like to have a peek at what I've got so far is invited to > download the 0.1.0 release

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >* There are some outstanding issues with the Dead Object > Detection/Garbage collection systems that I've yet to track down. I've fixed a bug that happened in combination with Hash iterators. Exactly the symptoms that I saw, when running: (prin

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-15 Thread Cory Spencer
(If anyone is able to track down aforementioned DOD/GC problems, you'll earn my eternal gratitude.) Can you please provide a code snippet that exhibits the error. Just running the program gives me errors on both Linux/x86 and OS X. Running with GC disabled works fine. On OS X with GC e

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-15 Thread Chip Salzenberg
According to Cory Spencer: > I'd like to announce the creation of the Parrot Common Lisp project Excellent! > * It's not a compiler yet, although I've got plans for that down the > road. (declare (type PerlString s)) ? :-) -- Chip Salzenberg- a.k.a. -<[EMAIL PROTE

Re: New language: Parrot Common Lisp

2005-04-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Cory Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to announce the creation of the Parrot Common Lisp project, which > aims to implement a significant subset of the Common Lisp language. Wow. I can even do something with it: $ ../parrot lisp.imc -> (+ 2 5) 7 -> (list 1 2 3) (1 . (2 . (3 . NIL)))

Re: New Language...

2002-06-21 Thread Jeff
Jeff wrote: > > For your edification/amusement/nightmares... > > A FORTH interpreter. > > Doesn't do much, but it -will- compile words. It accepts the following > input: > > > 3 : square ( n -- n ) dup * ; : cube ( n -- n ) > square> dup square * ; > cube> . > 27> > > I'll be adding new words

Re: new -language sublists. perl6-language-datetime and perl6-language-errors

2000-08-15 Thread Peter Scott
At 03:55 PM 8/15/00 -0700, you wrote: >LIST: perl6-language-errors >CHAIR: Steve Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MISSION:To develop RFCs related to error handling and exceptions > in Perl 6, possibly combining existing RFCs into a more > cohe