Daniel Grunblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2003 21:25, Bill Atkins wrote:
>> Am I correct in assuming that Parrot's JIT will eventually be able to
>> produce directly-executable files, like .exe's?
> Yes, you are.
Anything, what I might have missed? JIT 2?
> Daniel.
leo
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 21:25, Bill Atkins wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that Parrot's JIT will eventually be able to
> produce directly-executable files, like .exe's?
Yes, you are.
>
> Bill
Daniel.
Bill Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I correct in assuming that Parrot's JIT will eventually be able to produce
> directly-executable files, like .exe's?
Probably not via the JIT. The current approach (pbc2c.pl: producing a .c
source from bytecode) seems more general. This still needs some
