Re: NCI callback functions

2004-02-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 8:19 PM +0100 1/4/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>Its a bit complicated and brain-mangling, the more in the absence of >>any examples, but the current design in pdd16 seems to lack some >>flexibility and is IMHO missing the proper handling of the >>(library

Re: NCI callback functions

2004-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:19 PM +0100 1/4/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Its a bit complicated and brain-mangling, the more in the absence of any examples, but the current design in pdd16 seems to lack some flexibility and is IMHO missing the proper handling of the (library-provided) external_data. The latter will be pa