At 3:32 PM +0200 8/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can trigger the problem locally, though not with the nci tests.
(And, indeed, it may not be the NCI tests ultimately at fault) The
core dump shows things dying in the dod run.
It's fixed. See answer to you
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can trigger the problem locally, though not with the nci tests.
> (And, indeed, it may not be the NCI tests ultimately at fault) The
> core dump shows things dying in the dod run.
It's fixed. See answer to your ticket.
leo
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can trigger the problem locally, though not with
> the nci tests.
> (And, indeed, it may not be the NCI tests ultimately
> at fault) The
> core dump shows things dying in the dod run. GDB's
> backtrace is:
>
> Dan
Ok, I tracked it down to a CVS
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> > This might help shed some light:
> >
> > $ cd t/pmc
> > $ parrot nci_1.pasm
>
> Not really. bash: parrot: command not found ;)
> You got an old parrot around somewhere in the path?
No - believe it or not I only ever ke
At 10:06 AM +0200 8/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
$ parrot --gc-debug nci_1.pasm
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Well, I just don't have these segfaults. Wait ... Oops, I've turned
on incremental GC here, which could make it succeed. Recompiling ...
another coffee ...
No.
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
This might help shed some light:
$ cd t/pmc
$ parrot nci_1.pasm
Not really. bash: parrot: command not found ;)
You got an old parrot around somewhere in the path?
$ parrot --gc-debug nci_1.pasm
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Well, I just don't have these segfaults. Wait ..
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > t/pmc/nci.t28 716835 28 80.00%
> 1-27
>
> strange.
>
> > t/pmc/perlhash.t1 256361 2.78% 20
>
> Only that one is supposed to fail.
>
> leo
This might help shed so
At 5:26 PM +0200 8/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
t/pmc/nci.t28 716835 28 80.00% 1-27
strange.
Yeah. I've got NCI stuff failing all over the place for me on Linux,
though not in the test suite, which is frustrating. It's GC related
so far
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> t/pmc/nci.t28 716835 28 80.00% 1-27
strange.
> t/pmc/perlhash.t1 256361 2.78% 20
Only that one is supposed to fail.
leo
