On 7/7/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This long-winded (as usual) explanation brings me around to my actual question: is
there really any need to have the lexing and parsing stages clearly delineated? I can't
see why, but from you mentioning several times that "that's a parser's job, no
- Original Message
From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Also, since I had not seen the TAP::Harness work before, I didn't
> know that a separate parser was already being planned. My only
> motivation for writing TAP::Parser was my assumption that it was
> needed and was not going to otherwis
- Original Message
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/4/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because we're discarding anything which does not look like a plan or a test
> > line
>
> Don't discard them, just pass them through unaltered. Don't want to
> lose any informat
On 7/4/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because we're discarding anything which does not look like a plan or a test line
Don't discard them, just pass them through unaltered. Don't want to
lose any information. The /^#/ lines should be marked as comments.
Anything else is marked as junk bu
