Re: MSVC Warning Cleanup

2002-01-14 Thread Steve Fink
Oops, this patch broke things. For example, the following is invalid: > Index: chartypes/unicode.c > === > RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/chartypes/unicode.c,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -c -r1.5 unicode.c > *** chartypes/unico

Re: [REPATCH] was (Re: MSVC Warning Cleanup) [APPLIED]

2002-01-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 07:14 PM 1/14/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:41:07AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > > After this and Nicholas Clark's changes, compiler warnings may > > actually mean something now! > >Thanks (although I don't feel like I really deserve it, as I didn't think >I'd supp

Re: MSVC Warning Cleanup [APPLIED]

2002-01-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:13 PM 1/14/2002 -0500, Michel Lambert wrote: >This patch cleans up most of the MSVC-warnings when using warning level 4 >(the highest, one above the default level 3). It turns off two level-4 >warnings for 'unreferenced formal parameter' and 'named type definition in >parentheses', the latte

[REPATCH] was (Re: MSVC Warning Cleanup)

2002-01-14 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:41:07AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > After this and Nicholas Clark's changes, compiler warnings may > actually mean something now! Thanks (although I don't feel like I really deserve it, as I didn't think I'd supplied patches for very much, certainly not compared with wha

Re: MSVC Warning Cleanup

2002-01-14 Thread Steve Fink
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:13:12PM -0500, Michel Lambert wrote: > This patch tests correctly on MSVC and cygwin. If this patch is too broad, > please let me know and I'll go back and split it up. It's my first patch, > and I'll be sure to use multiple checkout directories to allow future > patches