Re: MMD: more implications

2004-12-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > General thoughts on the proposal to replace VTABLES with methods: > 1) Anything that is unary (i.e., contains exactly or one argument) is > not affected by MMD. That's not quite true. We currently have just infix MMD dispatching on left and right. That's just

Re: MMD: more implications

2004-12-05 Thread Sam Ruby
General thoughts on the proposal to replace VTABLES with methods: 1) Anything that is unary (i.e., contains exactly or one argument) is not affected by MMD. There is no need to replace any such methods. 2) While I don't see Python translators using a "sin" opcode, I can see the implementation o