On Aug 22, 2006, at 5:52 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
Has anyone looked at LLVM lately?
http://llvm.org/
I discovered it a few years ago. My personal interest is in the
portable C back end, so I can use the g++ compiler front end and send
the output through CodeWarrior or MPW compilers, whos
John Siracusa wrote:
On 8/23/06 4:09 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
here's the problem with that: llvm is a very light layer, but it's yet another
layer. To put it between parrot and hardware would mean that parrot is JITing
to LLVM byte-code, which is JITing to machine code. Not really ideal.
On 8/23/06 4:09 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> here's the problem with that: llvm is a very light layer, but it's yet another
> layer. To put it between parrot and hardware would mean that parrot is JITing
> to LLVM byte-code, which is JITing to machine code. Not really ideal.
...unless LLVM does a mu
On 8/23/06, Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, peter baylies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone looked at LLVM lately?
[...]
On the other hand, Parrot built quite nicely on x86-64, although I think I
> like t
On 8/23/06, peter baylies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/22/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked at LLVM lately?
[...]
On the other hand, Parrot built quite nicely on x86-64, although I think I
like the 32-bit build (which also built just fine, albeit without
On 8/22/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone looked at LLVM lately?
Yes, actually, I was looking at it just the other day. I couldn't get it to
build on x86-64, but I talked to some of the developers over in their IRC
channel, and they told me that this would be forthcoming
