On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 08:15:03AM +0100, Andy Wardley wrote:
> Dan wrote:
> > Should be FINALIZE.
>
> Although some in the non-US English speaking world might say it should
> be FINALISE.
FYI: FINALIZE is the spelling used by the Oxford English Dictionary.
See http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexp
Dan wrote:
> Should be FINALIZE.
Although some in the non-US English speaking world might say it should
be FINALISE.
Perhaps FINAL might be a better choice? That would please more of the
people for more of the time (or displease them for less of the time).
A
At 10:29 PM -0800 4/1/04, chromatic wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 09:39, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, here's a sketch of where I'm going with the initialization,
finalization, and fallback method locating. We need to do this
because we're in the semi-unenviable position of supporting multiple
lang
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, here's a sketch of where I'm going with the initialization,
> finalization, and fallback method locating.
As the current init scheme isn't really flying (and not in sync with
this proposal) here is a first hack to get it running.
> CONSTRUCT is the
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 09:39, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, here's a sketch of where I'm going with the initialization,
> finalization, and fallback method locating. We need to do this
> because we're in the semi-unenviable position of supporting multiple
> languages that do this but that *don't*
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm thinking of instead is to put properties on the class
> namespace PMC that indicate which method, if any, in the namespace is
> the proper method. And because initialization and finalization are...
> interesting (don't ask, we'll go there later) w
