At 10:33 PM +0100 1/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:28 AM +0100 1/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
And mainly the return convention are still broken.
I thought those were fixed.
Not yet.
I looked--PDD 03 is fixed, and has been for quite a while.
> ...
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:28 AM +0100 1/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>And mainly the return convention are still broken.
> I thought those were fixed.
Not yet.
> ... There's no difference between calling and
> return conventions
To be done.
leo
At 10:28 AM +0100 1/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did a cvs update, and it looks like imcc doesn't properly return
integers anymore from nonprototyped routines.
I don't even know if this is allowed. But anyway, if the call is non
prototyped, native types s
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a cvs update, and it looks like imcc doesn't properly return
> integers anymore from nonprototyped routines.
I don't even know if this is allowed. But anyway, if the call is non
prototyped, native types should go into P3. So you have the overhead of
P
