Jeff Clites wrote:
On Apr 15, 2004, at 11:12 AM, George R wrote:
I went with the --with-data-packaging=archive initially for 3
pragmatic reasons: (1) it seems to take a really, really long time to
build them into a library, and (2) once parrot "ships", if we use
--with-data-packaging=archive o
On Apr 15, 2004, at 11:12 AM, George R wrote:
I couldn't help but notice that you were talking about ICU on this
mailing list. Let me interject with some suggestions.
Thanks much for the message.
I should mention that ICU 2.6 can build a static data library. I
recommend that ICU be built with
