It's defining what NST means; the acronym is still a thing.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, James Ellis Osborne III
wrote:
> Line 1585:1587 Reads:
> --
> =head2 NST
>
> No Such Thing.
> --
>
> Surely Thi[j]s Is No Longer True?
>
> -jas
--
Will "Coke" C
Audrey Tang wrote:
>
> 在 Dec 18, 2006 5:52 AM 時，Fayland Lam 寫到：
>
>> we are trying to translate them into Chinese. so I just wonder where
>> can I get the .pod source?
>
> http://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/
Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
> Audrey
>
>
在 Dec 18, 2006 5:52 AM 時，Fayland Lam 寫到：
we are trying to translate them into Chinese. so I just wonder
where can I get the .pod source?
http://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/
Cheers,
Audrey
GlennH wrote:
Hello folks,
I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
thought I'd sign up the mailing list and skulk in the background.
Don't just skulk. Enlist!
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
jimk
On 1 Feb 2005, at 16:30, Shaun Fryer wrote:
[snip]
Hello!
Hello right back at ya :-)
Adrian
On 21 Jan 2005, at 17:09, Andy Lester wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:00:09PM +, GlennH ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
thought I'd sign up the mailing list and skulk in the background.
I'm a
Do you have a mention of what was
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:00:09PM +, GlennH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
> thought I'd sign up the mailing list and skulk in the background. I'm a
Do you have a mention of what was posted? I'm curious what was said.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:00:09PM +, GlennH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
Welcome to the group. You can also go add your name and address to the
HereToHelp page on the Kiwki.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTE
At 8:37 AM +0200 9/24/04, Christian Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
I am the french teacher who is trying to initiate my students to the
pleaasure of assembly language using Parrot.
For those who car read french, you can check our site :
http://www.dil.univ-mrs.fr/lic.ue.html#L-O3-5
I can't read french,
Christian Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am the french teacher who is trying to initiate my students to the
> pleaasure of assembly language using Parrot.
Great. Thanks for the note.
leo
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:02:29PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > cd foo && $(MAKE) && cd ..
> >
> so if submake fails, returning an exit code non-zero you don't cd .. ?
Yup. Better not fail, then.
> assuming you've got some sort of subs
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> One idiom which might work is
>
> cd foo && $(MAKE)
D'oh, that's
cd foo && $(MAKE) && cd ..
(remembering the actual initial problem . . . :-)
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Physics
Lafayette Colle
--- Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One idiom which might work is
>
> cd foo && $(MAKE)
>
> Since lines in makefiles are handed off to the native
> shell, this will
> be dependent upon the user's native shell. I don't know
> any details,
> but I gather the various shells in Wi
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:31 AM 12/12/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >Most 'makes' do set $(MAKE), but not all of them. I seem to recall that
> >some of the SystemV-derived ones don't. (Such systems are very poorly
> >represented on p5p, let alone p6i, so reliable in
Never mind. My e-mail client stopped downloading, so I didn't know this
was already being resolved. :^)
--Brent Dax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configure pumpking for Perl 6
"Nothing important happened today."
--George III of England's diary entry for 4-Jul-1776
Jaen Saul:
# I sent a post about the brokenness of Parrot on Windows 5
# days ago still
# no reaction... not one reply, positive or negative. Are you
# guys blind?
# I'm removing my own version of makefile.in and so the Win32
# tinderbox will
# fail builds (like it has most of the time).
# Ple
At 10:31 AM 12/12/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>Most 'makes' do set $(MAKE), but not all of them. I seem to recall that
>some of the SystemV-derived ones don't. (Such systems are very poorly
>represented on p5p, let alone p6i, so reliable information may be very
>hard to come by.)
At the m
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:06:16AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I'm not sure it will, though I'm hopeful.
> > In vain, apparently. Better, but not better enough.
>
> I *think* I've fixed the fix. The
> cd foo
> make
> solution has one big pr
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:13:45PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> My solution assumes (for now) that "make -C" works, and that make sets
> $(MAKE). Both of these assumptions are probably broken somewhere.
I don't think make -C is correct outside of GNU make, though ICBW. I
certainly thought I'd bee
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:06:16AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'm not sure it will, though I'm hopeful.
> In vain, apparently. Better, but not better enough.
I *think* I've fixed the fix. The
cd foo
make
solution has one big problem: Make does its work by forking and exec'ing
processe
At 03:02 PM 12/12/2001 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Jaen Saul wrote:
> > P.P.P.S Don't reply to this message unless you have something really
> > important to say. Go do something useful.
>
>Is "Dan has just committed something which should fix it" importan
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Jaen Saul wrote:
> P.P.P.S Don't reply to this message unless you have something really
> important to say. Go do something useful.
Is "Dan has just committed something which should fix it" important enough?
> All I wanted was to know why there were no
g useful.
All I wanted was to know why there were no replies, I meant no harm and I
didn't want to upset anyone.
-Jaen Saul
- Original Message -
From: "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jaen Saul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Decemb
23 matches
Mail list logo
